<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: From the Archives (Oregon &#8217;08)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/08/14/from-the-archives-oregon-08/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/08/14/from-the-archives-oregon-08/</link>
	<description>Jason Borger&#039;s Fly-Fishing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 15 May 2012 12:20:10 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/08/14/from-the-archives-oregon-08/comment-page-1/#comment-697</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 14:48:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishfliesandwater.com/?p=1675#comment-697</guid>
		<description>Bert&#8212;Diamond is a great guess, especially considering the size of the two fish, but this lake is definitely smaller and further north. Didn&#039;t mean to mislead with the &quot;treasure&quot; clue (sharp thinking on your part, though). Just meant more that the lakes of central Oregon are like gems scattered in the lava (or something like that).

I have a real fondness for smaller, sight-fishing lakes (or bigger, sight-fishing lakes, or mid-sized, sight...you get the picture). Central Oregon is proving to be a real &quot;treasure trove&quot; of those opportunities. Grew up doing that type of fishing every summer—for weeks at a stretch—and it is now just hard-coded into my fishing operating system, I think.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bert&mdash;Diamond is a great guess, especially considering the size of the two fish, but this lake is definitely smaller and further north. Didn&#8217;t mean to mislead with the &#8220;treasure&#8221; clue (sharp thinking on your part, though). Just meant more that the lakes of central Oregon are like gems scattered in the lava (or something like that).</p>
<p>I have a real fondness for smaller, sight-fishing lakes (or bigger, sight-fishing lakes, or mid-sized, sight&#8230;you get the picture). Central Oregon is proving to be a real &#8220;treasure trove&#8221; of those opportunities. Grew up doing that type of fishing every summer—for weeks at a stretch—and it is now just hard-coded into my fishing operating system, I think.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bert</title>
		<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/08/14/from-the-archives-oregon-08/comment-page-1/#comment-696</link>
		<dc:creator>Bert</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 12:02:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishfliesandwater.com/?p=1675#comment-696</guid>
		<description>Beauty! Let&#039;s follow the clues. Central Oregon. Treasure. Callibaetis. How about Diamond Lake?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beauty! Let&#8217;s follow the clues. Central Oregon. Treasure. Callibaetis. How about Diamond Lake?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

