<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Favorite Day &#8211; Gallatin (July &#8217;09)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/11/28/a-favorite-day-gallatin-july-09/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/11/28/a-favorite-day-gallatin-july-09/</link>
	<description>Jason Borger&#039;s Fly-Fishing Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 22:12:14 -0400</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: JB</title>
		<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/11/28/a-favorite-day-gallatin-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-1305</link>
		<dc:creator>JB</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 18:39:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishfliesandwater.com/?p=2148#comment-1305</guid>
		<description>Satoshi—As much as I like the look of the upper stretches of the Gallatin, I usually find myself fishing the mid (mid-canyon) to lower (west of the Bozeman area) reaches of the river. 

There are not many places on the Gallatin where I&#039;d want to make a true 70-foot cast unless I wanted to reach the opposing bank or a certain area for some reason (and even fewer still where I would make that cast and expect to control drag). The particular place I talk about in the story was a little side-channel that was straight and narrow with little overall current (an unusual spot on the river). I was casting up the length of the channel (actually a good portion of the cast was over rock or along the edge of the water, not directly up the flow itself), and backcast room was not an issue.  I just needed to be sure that I got the fly to the top of the pool. With such small/slow water, as long as the fly was far enough up, I was guessing (correctly as it turned out) that the fish would see it at some point in the drift.

I was just using a 9-foot rod for a 5, with my &quot;ED Comp&quot; Sharkskin line (that 120-footer that SA makes for the 5-weight casting games). I usually use the gray Sharkskin for fishing, but grabbed my reel bag without looking and got my two glo-orange, 5-weight competition lines, instead (one sharky, the other the standard, smooth-fishing AST).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Satoshi—As much as I like the look of the upper stretches of the Gallatin, I usually find myself fishing the mid (mid-canyon) to lower (west of the Bozeman area) reaches of the river. </p>
<p>There are not many places on the Gallatin where I&#8217;d want to make a true 70-foot cast unless I wanted to reach the opposing bank or a certain area for some reason (and even fewer still where I would make that cast and expect to control drag). The particular place I talk about in the story was a little side-channel that was straight and narrow with little overall current (an unusual spot on the river). I was casting up the length of the channel (actually a good portion of the cast was over rock or along the edge of the water, not directly up the flow itself), and backcast room was not an issue.  I just needed to be sure that I got the fly to the top of the pool. With such small/slow water, as long as the fly was far enough up, I was guessing (correctly as it turned out) that the fish would see it at some point in the drift.</p>
<p>I was just using a 9-foot rod for a 5, with my &#8220;ED Comp&#8221; Sharkskin line (that 120-footer that SA makes for the 5-weight casting games). I usually use the gray Sharkskin for fishing, but grabbed my reel bag without looking and got my two glo-orange, 5-weight competition lines, instead (one sharky, the other the standard, smooth-fishing AST).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Satoshi Yamamoto</title>
		<link>http://fishfliesandwater.com/2009/11/28/a-favorite-day-gallatin-july-09/comment-page-1/#comment-1300</link>
		<dc:creator>Satoshi Yamamoto</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Nov 2009 06:25:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://fishfliesandwater.com/?p=2148#comment-1300</guid>
		<description>Jason,
Thank you for sharing with us about your fishing details and views. 
I came to like Gallatin as much as Madison. But I haven&#039;t quite got a touch/crack of it yet. So far I like to explore the Park stretch. It seems less crowded. And just around the Park boundary which seems very fishy along with Taylor Fork.
It just makes me wonder that &quot;is there a stretch to make a 70-feet cast in Gallatin??&quot; I have passed HWY 191 lots of times but I can&#039;t think of it......As far as I see, most of the time, 20 to 30-feet cast would do in this fast and cold river....... Were you with 4-wt or 5-wt?
I think this is why we all like Gallatin along with Madison as its little sister.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jason,<br />
Thank you for sharing with us about your fishing details and views.<br />
I came to like Gallatin as much as Madison. But I haven&#8217;t quite got a touch/crack of it yet. So far I like to explore the Park stretch. It seems less crowded. And just around the Park boundary which seems very fishy along with Taylor Fork.<br />
It just makes me wonder that &#8220;is there a stretch to make a 70-feet cast in Gallatin??&#8221; I have passed HWY 191 lots of times but I can&#8217;t think of it&#8230;&#8230;As far as I see, most of the time, 20 to 30-feet cast would do in this fast and cold river&#8230;&#8230;. Were you with 4-wt or 5-wt?<br />
I think this is why we all like Gallatin along with Madison as its little sister.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
